Saturday 13 June 2015

Is the Holy Spirit Male or Female?

There are a number of websites, some academic, where this issue is discussed.  What I write here is not intended to be a thorough theological discourse but rather my own personal reflection.

Like many Christians my age I was brought up to think of God as male.  I have a Trinitarian understanding of God as essentially one but expressed in three persons.  The Trinity, like many other aspects of God is a mystery.  God is unique and no attempt to describe God is ever going to be adequate. Two of those persons present as essentially male: Father and Son.

I have therefore grown older talking with my heavenly Father.  The concept of God as Father is reflected in Hebrew scripture, is expressed in the words of Jesus in many places including the model prayer he gave to his disciples and in his own prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane.

Coming to know Jesus, growing in that relationship and discovering all I have come to know of Jesus has been by the presence of the Holy Spirit.  However the idea of attaching gender to the Holy Spirit is something that never crossed my mind for most of my long Christian life.  That began to change somewhere around 1991.  Although I had undertaken Old and New Testament studies and other education and training when I joined an evangelistic mission in 1963, none of this was certified and in order to be admitted onto the Roll of Ministries of the Congregational Federation (I had become a part-time minister of a Congregational Church) I had to undergo a thorough training programme.  By then I had accumulated some 28 years of ministry experience but the Congregational Federation was not minded to cut corners!

As part of those studies, which I greatly enjoyed, I was introduced into ways of doing theology that varied from and challenged my own practise.  This included both Liberation Theology and Feminist Theology.  Neither presented any major problem to me and I can honestly say that I "got it".  It was the latter that started me thinking more about the nature of God, and of the Holy Spirit in particular. It was not so much that this was a new exercise, just that I had not given much thought to articulate it before.

I was familiar with Genesis 1:27 which tells us that God created humankind in the image of God: both male and female.  I have never considered any anthropomorphic reference to suggest that God actually looks either like a man or a woman or a mixture of both.  rather I have always understood it as referring to characteristics rather than form. That is (if I may speak plainly) I have never imagined God with either a penis or vagina.  Come to that I never imagined God as necessarily having hands or feet etc.  I always understood this a figurative rather than literal.

It follows naturally that if both men and women are created in the image of God, then the best of both gender characteristics would give us some idea as to what God is like.  I had both a loving mother and father and value both.  I have a sister and brother - both very different - and I vale both.  Some characteristics that are typically male I also see in traces within those who are female and vice versa.

I began reflecting further on passages of scripture that attribute feminine characteristics to God.  Hosea speaks of God acting like a mother bear.  The scriptures speak of God giving birth to the nation of Israel.  Isaiah speaks of God as a comforting mother, and as a woman in child birth.  Both Matthew and Luke speak of God being like a mother hen.  Most would be very happy seeing God like a caring shepherd seeking a lost sheep or as a father longing for the return of a wayward son.  But should we not equally be comfortable with God in the image of a woman looking for a lost coin?

The Old Testament or Hebrew Scriptures were written in Hebrew.  Unlike English Hebrew nouns carry gender.  Some will be familiar with this if they have studied other languages.  I learned in Frech that "La plume (feminine) de ma tante (feminine) est sur le bureau (masculine) de mon oncle (masculine).  The pen of my aunt is on the bureau of my uncle.  The Hebrew word for Spirit, ruach, is feminine.

It is probable that much of Jesus' ministry was spoken in Aramaic in which the word for spirit is also feminine.

The New Testament comes to us in Greek which was the common or universal language of those times.  Reference to the Holy Spirit in the New Testament uses the word pneuma.  Greek nouns may be masculine, feminine or neuter (that is neither male nor female).  Pneuma is a neuter noun.

I have some friends who would be horrified to have God referred to as 'mother' but for others it would mean a great deal.  As far as I am concerned it does't bother me as I do not have a concept of God as either male or female but from whom the best qualities of maleness and femaleness are derived.  In public prayers I try to refer to God without having to use 'father' or 'Mother'.  If I have to do so I would probably only speak of God as Father, but then the term 'Mother God' has no biblical precedent.

For anyone who had a caring mother but a violent or abusive father there will be difficulty in thinking of God as father.  The opposite is also true.  All of us bring to the task of doing theology our own background, insights and experiences.  They become the prejudice or filter through which we try to grasp truth.

Back in 1991 on a training weekend one of the tutors deliberately chose a hymn for part of an act of worship.  The hymn addressed God solely as Mother.  Most students and tutors struggled and many of us could not bring ourselves to sing the words.  The next day, at a review of the weekend's activities the tutor who had chosen the controversial hymn asked if anyone wished to comment on it. There was a long silence until another tutor commented, "It had a nice tune!"

I found the words of the hymn thought provoking but I did not feel comfortable to use them as an act of worship.  I love my heavenly Father.  I love God the Son.  I delight in the presence of the Holy Spirit because the Spirit reveals the things of Jesus to me and this is so very precious.  That might very well be a feminine characteristic but does it really matter so long as we feel fathered and mothered by God?

Thank God for women! From where did they derive those intriguing and wonderful natures thgat have made my life so enjoyable?



Saturday 30 May 2015

Insight into the Trinity

Originally published in April 2012

When I was planning the recent Church Leaders Conference where the theme was partnership, I discussed with others the term perichoresis.

Perichoresis is a theological term used to describe an aspect of the relationship of the three persons of the Trinity. The word contains two Greek words: peri (around) and choresis (contain). Some wrongly think that the second Greek word is Chorus which means 'dance'. The term is used to describe how each retains separate complete identity yet are inter-related with the others. The exciting aspect (if you haven't already started to jump up and down) is that just as they share an inter-relational existence, we too are called by God into the same inter-relational existence. Here's a great illustration.

One Saturday a man named C Baxter Kruger was sitting sorting through papers when his six tear old son and a friend the man had never met before entered the room. They had been playing soldiers and were dressed up in camouflage with face paint and toy weapons. Before he knew it the man's son had jumped on him in a pretend attack, and the two of them fell to the floor in a friendly wrestling match. As they were playing around the other boy who was observing the fun decided to join in too. As the farther fooled around pretending to fight off his two young assailants, he felt that God told him that he needed to reflect on what had just happened.

His son, who had a confident relationship with his father, had involved his dad in some play. The son's friend who had never met the dad before felt drawn into this fun relationship and confidently acted as if he too were the man's son. The man then reflected on what might have happened if the other boy had walked into the room alone. This is what he later wrote.

"Within himself, that little boy had no freedom to have a relationship with me. We were strangers. He had no right to that kind of familiarity and fellowship. But my son knows me. My son knows that I love him and that I accept him and that he’s the apple of my eye. So in the knowledge of my love and affection, he did the most natural thing in the world. He dove into my lap. The miracle that happened was that my son’s knowledge of my acceptance and delight, and my son’s freedom for fellowship with me, rubbed off on that other little boy. He got to experience it. That other little boy got to taste and feel and know my son’s relationship with me. He participated in my son’s life and communion with me." 

There is no relationship more wonderful than that enjoyed between the persons of the Trinity and by adoption we are drawn into this relationship. Just as Jesus said "I am in the Father and the Father is in me" so he also said "On that day [the coming of the Holy Spirit] you will realise that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you." John 14:20.

While I enjoy reflecting on this wonderful act of grace I also wonder whether the quality of this relationship I enjoy is so obviously and visibly wonderful that people who know me want to join in as well, much as the son's friend did.

Barry Osborne
30 May 2015